面向可信和行为模式匹配的两层服务选择方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2014.04.033

J4 ›› 2014, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 198-204.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2014.04.033

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

面向可信和行为模式匹配的两层服务选择方法

孟宪佳;马建峰;卢笛;王一川

(西安电子科技大学计算机学院，陕西西安 710071)

收稿日期:2013-01-24 出版日期:2014-08-20 发布日期:2014-09-25
通讯作者: 孟宪佳
作者简介:孟宪佳(1985-)，男，西安电子科技大学博士研究生，E-mail: wddtsmxj8513@163.com．
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(JY10000903001)；长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助项目(IRT1078)

Trust and behavioral modeling based two layer service selection

MENG Xianjia;MA Jianfeng;LU Di;WANG Yichuan

(School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian Univ., Xi'an 710071, China)

Received:2013-01-24 Online:2014-08-20 Published:2014-09-25
Contact: MENG Xianjia

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在面向服务框架下，用户对服务有着不同的交互经验，并根据这些经验建立信任且对其评价，然而用户可能产生错误的评价进而影响公正的选择．为解决这一问题，提出一种两层选择算法选取可信并且符合用户偏好的服务．第1层用户将自己的经验与群体的评价趋势进行比对，优化自身的记录，生成更加可靠的经验信息．第2层用户由自己的偏好选出最符合需求的建议者．结果表明，这个方案可以过滤掉恶意的或经验不足的评价者，并选择出符合用户行为模式的服务．

关键词: 服务选择, 服务质量, 信任管理, 行为模式

Abstract:

In the Service-Oriented Architecture(SOA), the consumer has many experiences in service,and then based on the experiences he builds trust and reputation. But lack of experiences or a malicious adviser will lead to unfair selection. In this paper,we propose a two-layer selecting algorithm to meet the demand of the consumer. In the first layer the consumer uses social records update his own to get more accurate experience. Afterwards, in the second layer, the consumer selects the most suitable. The result shows that our approach will filter the malicious participants,and then chose the services which fit consumer's preference.

Key words: service selection, quality of service, trust, behavioral modeling

孟宪佳;马建峰;卢笛;王一川. 面向可信和行为模式匹配的两层服务选择方法[J]. J4, 2014, 41(4): 198-204.

MENG Xianjia;MA Jianfeng;LU Di;WANG Yichuan. Trust and behavioral modeling based two layer service selection[J]. J4, 2014, 41(4): 198-204.

参考文献

［1］ Falcone R, Castelfranchi C. Generalizing Trust: Inferencing Trust Worthiness from Categories［C］//Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: 5396. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008: 65-80.
［2］万涛, 廖维川, 马建峰. 面向多服务器架构的认证协议分析与改进［J］. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2013, 40(6):174-179.
Wan Tao, Liao Weichuan, Ma Jianfeng. Analysis and Improvement of Anauthentication Protocol for the Multi-server Architecture［J］. Journal of Xidian University, 2013, 40(6): 174-179.
［3］ Huynh T D, Jennings N R, Shadbolt N R. An Integrated Trust and Reputation Model for Open Multi-agent Systems［J］. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2006, 13(2): 119-154.
［4］ Kerr R, Cohen R. Smart Cheaters Do Prosper: Defeating Trust and Reputation Systems［C］//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: 2. Budapest: IFAAMAS, 2009: 798-805.
［5］ Noorian Z, Ulieru M. The State of the Art in Trust and Reputation Systems: a Framework for Comparison［J］. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2010, 5(2): 97-117.
［6］ Jsang A, Quattrociocchi W. Advanced Features in Bayesian Reputation Systems［C］//Lecture Notes in Computer Science: 5695. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2009: 105-114.
［7］ Whitby A, Josang A, Indulska J. Filtering Out Unfair Ratings in Bayesian Reputation Systems［C］//Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies. NewYork: IEEE, 2004: 48-64.
［8］ Wang Yonghong, Singh M P. Formal Trust Model for Multiagent Systems［C］//Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence. San Francisco: IJCAI, 2007: 1551-1556.
［9］ Keung S, Griffiths N. Building a Trust-based Social Agent Network［C］//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: 1. Budapest: IFAAMAS, 2009: 68-79.
［10］ Sen S, Malone N, Chakraborty K. Comprehensive Trust Management［C］//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: 1. Budapest: IFAAMAS, 2009: 129-146.
［11］ Maximilien E M, Singh M P. Toward Autonomic Web Services Trust and Selection［C］//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Service Oriented Computing. New York: Springer, 2004: 212-221.
［12］ Salehi-Abari A, White T. Detecting and Dealing with Naive Agents in Trust-aware Societies［C］//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: 1. Budapest: IFAAMAS, 2009: 117-128.
［13］ Maximilien E M, Singh M P. Reputation and Endorsement for Web Services［C］//SIGecom Exchanges: 3. Berlin: Springer, 2001: 24-31.
［14］ Noorian Z, Marsh S, Fleming M. Prob-COG: An Adaptive Filtering Model for Trust Evaluation［C］//IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology: 358. New York: Springer, 2011: 206222.
［15］邓凡, 陈平, 张立勇, 等. 授权服务中策略决策点的高效评估方法［J］. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2013, 40(6): 105-112.
Deng Fan, Chen Ping, Zhang Liyong, et al. Study of High Efficiency of Evaluation of a PDP in Authorization Service［J］. Journal of Xidian University, 2013, 40(6): 105-112.

[1]	曹静;武君胜;杨文超;王硕晨. 认知无线ad hoc网的多尺度跨层路由协议[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2018, 45(2): 77-83.
[2]	段瑞猛;马文平;罗维;赵飞飞. 一个毫微微小区网络中的全分布式资源分配策略[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2017, 44(3): 36-42.
[3]	杨鹏;李祥攀;刘豆 . LTE中增强视频业务QoS的时延感知调度算法 [J]. J4, 2015, 42(2): 140-145.
[4]	徐琳;曲仕茹;鱼滨. ITSGrid资源调度策略的研究[J]. J4, 2014, 41(3): 203-208.
[5]	李庆;董庆宽;赵蕾. 云模型中正向云算法的修正[J]. J4, 2013, 40(5): 169-174+180.
[6]	彭飞;邓浩江;刘磊. 面向个性化服务推荐的QoS动态预测模型[J]. J4, 2013, 40(4): 174-180.
[7]	江亮亮;杨付正;任光亮. 利用两级时域联合的包层语音质量评价模型[J]. J4, 2013, 40(3): 14-19+94.
[8]	杨延飞;朱樟明;周端;杨银堂. 用于片上网络的延时无关异步动态优先级仲裁器[J]. J4, 2012, 39(1): 42-48+110.
[9]	张琰;盛敏;李建东;田野;姚俊良. 一种新型动态协同节点选择策略[J]. J4, 2010, 37(1): 73-79.
[10]	黄伯虎;段振华. 量子遗传算法在Web服务选择中的应用[J]. J4, 2010, 37(1): 56-61+67.
[11]	李建东;陈婷;邓少平;李长乐. WiMAX中保证QoS的跨层架构研究[J]. J4, 2009, 36(4): 573-582.
[12]	张国鹏;张海林. 无线局域网中业务流接入控制的博弈论算法 [J]. J4, 2008, 35(5): 805-810.
[13]	李屹;纪红. 无线局域网中一种支持QoS的协作分集算法 [J]. J4, 2008, 35(1): 162-166.
[14]	李波1;李建东2;方勇1. 非饱和状态下IEEE 802．11 DCF的性能分析 [J]. J4, 2007, 34(1): 76-81.
[15]	田玉敏;马勇. P2P网络下基于联合投票的成员资格协议 [J]. J4, 2007, 34(1): 110-114.

面向可信和行为模式匹配的两层服务选择方法

Trust and behavioral modeling based two layer service selection

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10