一种抗伪造攻击的车联网无证书聚合签密方案

doi:10.19665/j.issn1001-2400.2023.02.017

Abstract

Abstract:

Vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs) have received substantial attention on account of great convenience to modern transportation systems.In VANETs,the authentication of the vehicular access control and the privacy of the messages are two crucial criteria.At the same time,verification efficiency is still critical due to the limited bandwidth and high mobility characteristics of vehicles.Aggregate signcryption schemes can effectively solve the above issues.However,some of the state-of-art schemes based on the Schnorr signature are unable to resist two types of signature forgery attacks due to incorrect hash binding.In addition,two vehicles can maliciously exchange their signcryption information which can be verified successfully.A new certificateless aggregate signcryption scheme for VANETs is presented.Secret key preimage protection technology is used to prevent signature forgery attacks and hash collision resistance is utilized to resist coalition attack.The confidentiality and unforgeability of the scheme are proved under the random oracle model.Furthermore,in comparison with the state-of-art schemes,the proposed scheme which requires 6n+1 point multiplication operations during the whole authentication process enhances security without increasing computational overhead.Performance analysis shows that the scheme is suitable for VANETs.

Key words: certificateless aggregate signcryption, authentication, vehicular ad hoc networks, signature forgery attack

CLC Number:

TP309

PAN Senshan,WANG Saifei. Certificateless aggregate signcryption scheme against forgery attacks for vehicular ad-hoc networks[J].Journal of Xidian University, 2023, 50(2): 169-177.

Figures/Tables 4

References 15

[1]	ALI I, CHEN Y, FAISAL M, et al. ECCHSC:Computationally and Bandwidth Efficient ECC-Based Hybrid Signcryption Protocol for Secure Heterogeneous Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communications[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2021, 9(6):4435-4450. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3104010
[2]	THUMBUR G, RAO G S, REDDY P V, et al. Efficient and Secure Certificateless Aggregate Signature-Based Authentication Scheme for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2020, 8(3):1908-1920. doi: 10.1109/JIoT.6488907
[3]	杨颜博, 张嘉伟, 马建峰. 一种使用区块链保护车联网数据隐私的方法[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2021, 48(3):21-30.
	YANG Yanbo, ZHANG Jiawei, MA Jianfeng. Method for Using the Blockchain to Protect Data Privacy of IoV[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2021, 48(3):21-30.
[4]	LIU Z Q, MA J F, WENG J, et al. LPPTE:a Lightweight Privacy-Preserving Trust Evaluation Scheme for Facilitating Distributed Data Fusion in Cooperative Vehicular Safety Applications[J]. Information Fusion, 2021, 73:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.03.003
[5]	ARIF M, WANG G, BHUIYAN M Z A, et al. A Survey on Security Attacks in VANETs:Communication,Applications and Challenges[J]. Vehicular Communications, 2019, 19:100179. doi: 10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100179
[6]	LIU Y L, WANG L M, CHEN H H. Message Authentication Using Proxy Vehicles in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2014, 64(8):3697-3710. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2014.2358633
[7]	ZHENG Y L. Digital Signryption or how to Achieve Cost(Signature & Encryption)<<Cost(Signature)+Cost(Encryption)[C]//Annual International Cryptology Conference. Heidelberg:Springer, 1997:165-179.
[8]	XU Z Y, LUO M, KHAN M K, et al. Analysis and Improvement of a Certificateless Signature Scheme for Resource-Constrained Scenarios[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2020, 25(4):1074-1078. doi: 10.1109/COML.4234
[9]	BONEH D, GENTYR C, LYNN B, et al. Aggregate and Verifiably Encrypted Signatures from Bilinear Maps[C]//International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. Heidelberg:Springer, 2003:382-391.
[10]	牛淑芬, 李振彬, 王彩芬. 适用于车载网的匿名异构聚合签密方案[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2019, 41(1):80-87.
	NIU Shufeng, LI Zhenbin, WANG Caifen. An Anonymous Heterogeneous Aggregate Signcryption Scheme for Vehicular Networks[J]. Computer Engineering & Science, 2019, 41(1):80-87.
[11]	KIM T H, KUMAR G, SAHA R, et al. CASCF:Certificateless Aggregated Sign Cryption Framework for Internet-of-Things Infrastructure[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8:94748-94756. doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639
[12]	YU H F, REN R. Certificateless Elliptic Curve Aggregate SignCryption Scheme[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2022, 16(2):2347-2354. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3096531
[13]	陈虹, 周沫, 侯宇婷, 等. 可公开验证无对运算的无证书聚合签密方案[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2021, 16(19):2519-2530.
	CHEN Hong, ZHOU Mo, HOU Yuting, et al. Certificateless Aggregate Signcryption Scheme with Publicly Verifiable Pairless Operation[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2021, 16(19):2519-2530.
[14]	GONG B, WU Y, WANG Q, et al. A Secure and Lightweight Certificateless Hybrid Signcryption Scheme for Internet of Things[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2022, 127:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.08.027
[15]	YANG Y F, ZHANG L, ZHAO Y L, et al. Privacy-Preserving Aggregation-Authentication Scheme for Safety Warning System in Fog-Cloud Based VANET[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2022, 17:317-331. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2022.3140657

方案	签密计算开销	解签密计算开销	总开销	消息真实性	批验证	不可伪造性	可追踪性
文献[10]	2T_M+T_P	2T_P	2nT_M+3nT_P	√	√	√	√
文献[11]	6T_M+T_P	T_M+T_P	7nT_M+2nT_P	√	√	√	√
文献[12]	3T_M	3T_M	(6n+1)T_M	×	√	×	√
文献[13]	3T_M	3T_M	(6n+1)T_M	×	√	×	√
文献[14]	T_M	2T_M+T_P	3nT_M+nT_P	√	×	√	√
文献[15]	6T_M	3T_M+5T_P	9nT_M+5T_P	√	√	√	√
文中方案	3T_M	3T_M	(6n+1)T_M	√	√	√	√

Certificateless aggregate signcryption scheme against forgery attacks for vehicular ad-hoc networks

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 15

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	FAN Meiyue,DONG Qingkuan,WANG Lei,YANG Can. TTP-free weighted muti-owner RFID tag authentication protocol [J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2021, 48(1): 133-140.
[2]	LI Xiaowei,YANG Dengqi,ZHENG Xin,ZHU Xingwen,CHEN Benhui,ZHANG Yuqing. Cross-domain authentication and the key agreement protocol in VANETs [J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2021, 48(1): 141-148.
[3]	SI Chengxiang,GAO Feng,ZHU Liehuang,GONG Guopeng,ZHANG Can,CHEN Zhuo,LI Ruiguang. Covert data transmission mechanism based on dynamic label in blockchain [J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2020, 47(5): 94-102.
[4]	LIU Jiao;SUN Cong;MA Jianfeng;JIAO Zhengda. Remote authorization protocol for vehicle diagnosis using trusted platform measurements [J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2017, 44(3): 49-54+119.
[5]	XU Jie;DANG Lanjun;SHI Guangming. Efficient mobile IP registration protocol with AAA using pairing-free certificateless public key cryptography [J]. J4, 2014, 41(2): 51-57.
[6]	WAN Tao;LIAO Weichuan;MA Jianfeng. Analysis and improvement of an authentication protocol for the multi-server architecture [J]. J4, 2013, 40(6): 174-179.
[7]	TONG Ming;WU Yangcheng;ZHANG Jianlong;LUAN Yingzi. Multiple watermarking framework of video content oriented AVS [J]. J4, 2013, 40(4): 6-13.
[8]	LI Huixian. Design and analysis of the light-weight mutual authentication protocol for RFID [J]. J4, 2012, 39(1): 172-178.
[9]	ZHANG Ronglin;LIU Eryun;ZHAO Heng;PANG Liaojun. Improved cancelable fingerprint fuzzy vault system [J]. J4, 2011, 38(4): 173-180.
[10]	LIU Jinye;GU Lize;LUO Shoushan;YANG Yixian;CUI Jun;WU Xingyao. Anonymous authentication scheme for mobile communication [J]. J4, 2011, 38(1): 176-183.
[11]	DU Zhi-qiang;SHEN Yu-long;MA Jian-feng;ZHOU Li-hua. Practical broadcast authentication protocol for sensor networks [J]. J4, 2010, 37(2): 305-310+325.
[12]	ZHU Hui;LI Hui;WANG Yu-min. Fast authentication protocol based on the Canetti-Krawczyk model [J]. J4, 2009, 36(1): 156-161.
[13]	LIU Chun1;LIU Jian-wei1;ZHANG Qi-shan1;LI Hui2. A non-certificated Ad hoc key management and authentication model [J]. J4, 2007, 34(6): 974-979.
[14]	CAO Xue-fei;ZENG Xing-wen;KOU Wei-dong;YU Yong. A novel anonymous authentication scheme over the insecure channel [J]. J4, 2007, 34(6): 877-880.
[15]	YANG Chao;CAO Chun-jie;MA Jian-feng. Universally composable secure authentication protocol for wireless mesh networks [J]. J4, 2007, 34(5): 814-817.